September 2007
Eye Care in the African American Community and Beyond
Many Americans at risk of vision loss do not have access to education or services.
In 2000, approximately 3.3 million Americans aged ≥40 years were visually impaired, and >11 million of those aged ≥12 years needed spectacles or contact lenses, according to the article. By 2020, those numbers could increase by more than 50%.
Furthermore, data from the 2002 National Health Interview Survey found that 61 million American adults are at high risk of serious vision loss. Of those, only half visited an eye doctor or had a dilated eye examination, in the past 12 months. Approximately one-third of the estimated 144 million individuals not at high risk of serious vision loss, visited an eye doctor or had a dilated eye exam in the past year, according to the survey.
“Many conditions causing visual impairment and blindness are often asymptomatic in their early treatable stages,” wrote Xinzhi Zhang, MD, PhD, and colleagues. “There is a substantial inequity in access to eye care in the United States. Better targeting of resources and efforts toward people at high risk may help reduce these disparities.”
AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY
In an attempt to examine how some of these disparities could have an impact on a specific community, Dr. Zhang, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and colleagues, analyzed data on a predominantly African American community in Raleigh, NC.2 The community of Greensboro, NC, was used as a comparison community.
Data were gathered from Project DIRECT (Diabetes Intervention Reaching and Educating Communities Together), the first community project to attempt a comprehensive approach to reduce the burden of diabetes in at-risk patients within the African American community. Dr. Zhang wanted to see if eye care education would improve dilated eye exam rates or the use of eye care services among this at-risk population (see Information Gaps).
PROGRAM IMPACT
The DIRECT program gathered data on 646 adults with self-reported diabetes from 1996 to 1997 and 720 adults in 2003 to 2004.
The analysis of DIRECT showed that 41.6% of the Raleigh study population displayed signs of DR in 1997. That proportion dropped to 38.5% by 2004, while DR prevalence rates in Greensboro saw little change during the same time period (ie, 38.5% and 38.1%).
Additionally, the proportion of individuals who received a dilated eye exam increased by approximately 4.5% in the Raleigh group, and by 4% in the Greensboro group. Eye care education, however, increased by 0.3% in Greensboro and decreased by 1.5% in Raleigh.
In an e-mail interview with Retina Today, Dr. Zhang cautioned against making a quick judgment on the outcome of the program. “The change in DR is not statistically significant. It takes years for people to develop DR, and it may take much longer for us to see the impact of specific eye care education in this area,” he said.
He concluded that community intervention efforts (eg, comprehensive eye care education) may need to be specifically targeted to improve DR and the use of eye care services among at-risk patients (see Public Awareness Initiatives).
“Eye care education was found to be associated with increased eye care utilization among people with diabetes. Future community intervention efforts need to continue to target DR, which remains a considerable problem among African American communities,” he said.
Xinzhi Zhang, MD, PhD, is at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in Atlanta. Dr. Zhang may be reached at xbz3@cdc.gov.
1. Zhang X, Saaddine JB, Lee PP, et al. Eye care in the United States: do we deliver to high-risk people who can benefit most from it? Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:411-418.
2. Zhang X, Williams DE, Beckles GL, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy, dilated eye exam and eye care education among African American community, Raleigh and Greensboro, North Carolina 1997-2004. Poster presentation at 67th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association: June 22-26, 2007: Chicago.
September 2007
More from this issue